[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180213182521.GA51247@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:25:22 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, briannorris@...gle.com,
dtor@...gle.com, dianders@...gle.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
stephen lu <lumotuwe@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: gpio-keys - add support for wakeup event
action
Hi Enric,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> On 12/02/18 23:13, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:09:05PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> >> Add support for specifying event actions to trigger wakeup when using
> >> the gpio-keys input device as a wakeup source.
> >>
> >> This would allow the device to configure when to wakeup the system. For
> >> example a gpio-keys input device for pen insert, may only want to wakeup
> >> the system when ejecting the pen.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> Specify wakeup event action instead of irq trigger type as Brian
> >> suggested.
[...]
> Not sure if you were aware but there is also some discussion related to this,
> maybe we can join the efforts?
>
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10208261/
> v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211147/
Thanks for the pointers. IIUC, that's talking about a different problem:
how to utilize a GPIO key in level-triggered mode. That touches similar
code, but it doesn't really have anything to do with configuring a
different wakeup trigger type.
The two patches would need to be reconciled, if they both are going to
be merged. But otherwise, I think they're perfectly fine to be separate.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists