lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7e7e2c2-c83d-9c4a-f3ac-5c351576b567@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:24:56 -0500
From:   "Hook, Gary" <ghook@....com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd - Use dev_err to send events to the system log

On 2/13/2018 11:00 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:47:55AM -0500, Hook, Gary wrote:
>>
>>          dev_err(&iommu->dev->dev, "ILLEGAL...
> 
> I think its more something like iommu->iommu->dev.
> 
> 


Without actually running a driver and getting some debug info, I'll just
say that my example compiled, the amd_iommu structure points to a 
pci_dev which contains a device, and the two possibilities are likely 
equivalent.

I'll vet that, of course, but working under the assumption that they are 
equivalent, the question becomes, do you have a preference?

Thanks,
Gary

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ