[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23a83979-e0d9-85b6-5a34-1c293362420e@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:51:01 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"aaro.koskinen@....fi" <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
CC: "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"ladis@...ux-mips.org" <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
"narmstrong@...libre.com" <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kristo, Tero" <t-kristo@...com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk"
<sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
"Strashko, Grygorii" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com" <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] dmtimer: Add timer ops to the platform data
structure
On Tuesday 13 February 2018 08:16 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 12:23 AM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> Add timer ops to the platform data structure
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
>> Tested-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h
>> b/include/linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h
>> index a19b78d..a3e1794 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h
>> @@ -20,12 +20,50 @@
>> #ifndef __PLATFORM_DATA_DMTIMER_OMAP_H__
>> #define __PLATFORM_DATA_DMTIMER_OMAP_H__
>>
>> +struct omap_dm_timer_ops {
>> + struct omap_dm_timer *(*request_by_node)(struct device_node *np);
>> + struct omap_dm_timer *(*request_specific)(int timer_id);
>> + struct omap_dm_timer *(*request)(void);
>> +
>> + int (*free)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> +
>> + void (*enable)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> + void (*disable)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> +
>> + int (*get_irq)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> + int (*set_int_enable)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
>> + unsigned int value);
>> + int (*set_int_disable)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, u32 mask);
>> +
>> + struct clk *(*get_fclk)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> +
>> + int (*start)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> + int (*stop)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> + int (*set_source)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int source);
>> +
>> + int (*set_load)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int autoreload,
>> + unsigned int value);
>> + int (*set_match)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int enable,
>> + unsigned int match);
>> + int (*set_pwm)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int def_on,
>> + int toggle, int trigger);
>> + int (*set_prescaler)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int prescaler);
>> +
>> + unsigned int (*read_counter)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> + int (*write_counter)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
>> + unsigned int value);
>> + unsigned int (*read_status)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer);
>> + int (*write_status)(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
>> + unsigned int value);
>> +};
>> +
>> struct dmtimer_platform_data {
>> /* set_timer_src - Only used for OMAP1 devices */
>> int (*set_timer_src)(struct platform_device *pdev, int source);
> Have you looked into collapsing this into the set_source() option above
> for OMAP1? Looks like the only reason the pdev is needed is for
> retrieving the pdev id, which is also stored in the omap_dm_timer structure?
I would prefer not to touch the mach-omap1 part as part of this
migration series. I will revisit this once the migration is done.
>
>> u32 timer_capability;
>> u32 timer_errata;
>> int (*get_context_loss_count)(struct device *);
>> + struct omap_dm_timer_ops *timer_ops;
>
> Any reason why this is not a const? We don't expect this to change right.
Yes this can be.
>
> regards
> Suman
>
>> };
>>
>> #endif /* __PLATFORM_DATA_DMTIMER_OMAP_H__ */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists