linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] mmc: tmio: another batch of TMIO MMC fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFox8m4maTHQZi4gzyi=UVh0KO_xnfhjbjeMxsd=a9PB5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:39:26 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] mmc: tmio: another batch of TMIO MMC fixes and cleanups

On 14 February 2018 at 11:23, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>> You need to check again. :-)
>
> Seems like it. Sorry for the noise.
>
>> I am eager to apply those patches you already have reviewed (to
>> patch14), as those mostly seemed rather trivial and should be nice
>> cleanups.
>>
>> Do you mind me going ahead, then you can continue and review/test the rest?
>
> Yes, we can work incremently from there. I'll send patches if I discover
> something unexpected.
>

Great! So, applied patches 7->14.

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe