[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180214104935.GS12979@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:49:35 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, lizefan@...wei.com, mingo@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com, bristot@...hat.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/10] sched/core: Prevent race condition between
cpuset and __sched_setscheduler()
On 14/02/18 11:36, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On 13/02/18 13:32, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > No synchronisation mechanism exist between the cpuset subsystem and calls
> > to function __sched_setscheduler(). As such it is possible that new root
> > domains are created on the cpuset side while a deadline acceptance test
> > is carried out in __sched_setscheduler(), leading to a potential oversell
> > of CPU bandwidth.
> >
> > By making available the cpuset_mutex to the core scheduler it is possible
> > to prevent situations such as the one described above from happening.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index f727c3d0064c..0d8badcf1f0f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4176,6 +4176,13 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * Make sure we don't race with the cpuset subsystem where root
> > + * domains can be rebuilt or modified while operations like DL
> > + * admission checks are carried out.
> > + */
> > + cpuset_lock();
> > +
> > + /*
>
> Mmm, I'm afraid we can't do this. __sched_setscheduler might be called
> from interrupt contex by normalize_rt_tasks().
Maybe conditionally grabbing it if pi is true could do? I guess we don't
care much about domains when sysrq.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists