[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518567057.12890.99.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:10:57 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, thomas.lendacky@....com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/retpoline: Add clang support
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 15:41 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:32:11PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > >
> > > See
> > > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux-retpoline.git/commitdiff/82a1f41600
>
> Any chance to see a patch with this change anytime soon ?
We were waiting for a fix for
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36329
I tested the candidate fix tonight and reported success; the
corresponding patch is at the top of my tree. Since I think we now have
a consensus on what the clang build will look like, I'll post that in
the morning along with the other bits I have ready to send upstream.
We're going to need the percpu.h fix too, and I'd also like to see the
status of the i915 build failure you mentioned. Is there a bug filed
for that already, and is it on the blocker list for 6.0? If not, why
not?
We also need to resolve the asm-goto thing.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists