[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180214142809.GT27191@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:28:09 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
Radion Mirchevsky <radion.mirchevsky@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] thunderbolt: Add support for Intel Titan Ridge
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:23:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Intel Titan Ridge is the next Thunderbolt 3 controller. The ICM firmware
> > message format in Titan Ridge differs from Falcon Ridge and Alpine Ridge
> > somewhat because it is using route strings addressing devices. In
> > addition to that the DMA port of 4-channel (two port) controller is in
> > different port number than the previous controllers. There are some
> > other minor differences as well.
> >
> > This patch add support for Intel Titan Ridge and the new ICM firmware
> > message format.
>
> > static int dma_find_port(struct tb_switch *sw)
> > {
> > + static const int ports[] = { 7, 5, 3 };
>
> Is it anything special in ordering? Otherwise I would keep it the same
> as in comment below.
I don't think there is anything special in ordering so I can update it
accordingly.
> > + int i;
> >
> > /*
> > + * The DMA (NHI) port is either 3, 5 or 7 depending on the
> > + * controller. Try all of them.
> > */
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ports); i++) {
> > + u32 type;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = dma_port_read(sw->tb->ctl, &type, tb_route(sw), ports[i],
> > + 2, 1, DMA_PORT_TIMEOUT);
> > + if (!ret && (type & 0xffffff) == TB_TYPE_NHI)
> > + return ports[i];
> > + }
>
> > +static inline u64 get_parent_route(u64 route)
> > +{
> > + int depth = tb_route_length(route);
> > + return depth ? route & ~((u64)0xff << (depth - 1) * TB_ROUTE_SHIFT) : 0;
>
> 0xffULL ?
>
> > +}
>
> > + const struct icm_tr_event_device_connected *pkg =
> > + (const struct icm_tr_event_device_connected *)hdr;
>
> > + const struct icm_tr_event_device_disconnected *pkg =
> > + (const struct icm_tr_event_device_disconnected *)hdr;
>
> > + const struct icm_tr_event_xdomain_connected *pkg =
> > + (const struct icm_tr_event_xdomain_connected *)hdr;
>
> > + const struct icm_tr_event_xdomain_disconnected *pkg =
> > + (const struct icm_tr_event_xdomain_disconnected *)hdr;
>
>
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALPINE_RIDGE_LP_USBONLY_NHI 0x15dc
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALPINE_RIDGE_USBONLY_NHI 0x15dd
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALPINE_RIDGE_C_USBONLY_NHI 0x15de
>
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TITAN_RIDGE_2C_NHI 0x15e8
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TITAN_RIDGE_2C_BRIDGE 0x15e7
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TITAN_RIDGE_4C_NHI 0x15eb
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TITAN_RIDGE_4C_BRIDGE 0x15ea
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TITAN_RIDGE_DD_BRIDGE 0x15ef
>
> Can we keep it sorted?
It is sorted by the controller type ;-)
>
> > +#define ICM_TR_INFO_SLEVEL_MASK 0x7
>
> GENMASK() ?
OK.
> > +#define ICM_TR_INFO_BOOT_ACL_SHIFT 7
> > +#define ICM_TR_INFO_BOOT_ACL_MASK GENMASK(12, 7)
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists