[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180214154144.GB93895@bjorns-mbp-2.lan>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:41:44 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, david.brown@...aro.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, yanhe@...cinc.com,
ramkri@....qualcomm.com, sdharia@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: make bam clk optional
On Wed 14 Feb 06:44 PST 2018, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> @@ -1233,13 +1233,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "qcom,controlled-remotely");
>
> bdev->bamclk = devm_clk_get(bdev->dev, "bam_clk");
> - if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk))
> - return PTR_ERR(bdev->bamclk);
> -
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(bdev->bamclk);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(bdev->dev, "failed to prepare/enable clock\n");
> - return ret;
> + if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk)) {
In the case of !bdev->controlled_remotely I think this should still be
an error.
> + bdev->bamclk = NULL;
> + } else {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(bdev->bamclk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(bdev->dev, "failed to prepare/enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
The rest of the driver will keep operating the bamclk (which is okay),
so for symmetry purposes I think you should just keep the
clk_prepare_enable() block unmodified.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists