[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180214164438.GI18349@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:44:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Add a framework for supporting
MSR-based features
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:58:46PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> @@ -2681,11 +2731,15 @@ static int __msr_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_msrs *msrs,
> {
> int i, idx;
>
> - idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> + if (vcpu)
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < msrs->nmsrs; ++i)
> if (do_msr(vcpu, entries[i].index, &entries[i].data))
> break;
> - srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> +
> + if (vcpu)
> + srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
./include/linux/srcu.h:175:2: warning: ‘idx’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
__srcu_read_unlock(sp, idx);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2739:9: note: ‘idx’ was declared here
int i, idx;
^~~
I know, silly gcc.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists