[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180215174444.GA25970@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:44:44 -0700
From: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dwmw@...zon.co.uk, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: hpwdt: Remove spinlock acquire and BIOS calls
from NMI context
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:17:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Ingo,
> >
> > I have a patch set under review that brings hpwdt into compliance
> > with the watchdog core.
> >
> > One of the changes removes the callback into firmware in hpwdt_pretimeout
> > and its associated spinlock.
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/12/30
>
> drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c | 490 +----------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 482 deletions(-)
>
> Very nice, and this should solve all the NMI handling complications!
>
> > I will add you to the CC list of the next version of the set.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ingo
Ingo,
Is your desire to remove of the firmware callback/spinlock in hpwdt_pretimeout
related to David Woodhouse patch set:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/14/305 ?
Which I think are to mitigate performance issues resulting from the
changes to address the specter/meltdown?
Any there other changes to hpwdt needed related to this work?
Thanks
Jerry
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists