[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_PQPce3Xdn3_2Sh-=Y20m=xrVCGBrJ-LjhKdXp+7adrOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:36:08 -0500
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
Cc: Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] locking/ww_mutex: cleanup lock->ctx usage in amdgpu
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> wrote:
> amdgpu needs to verify if userspace sends us valid addresses and the simplest
> way of doing this is to check if the buffer object is locked with the ticket
> of the current submission.
>
> Clean up the access to the ww_mutex internals by providing a function
> for this and extend the check to the thread owning the underlying mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Shouldn't this be two patches? One to add the new ww_mutex code and
one to update amdgpu?
Alex
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index eaa3cb0c3ad1..4c04b560e358 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> @@ -1594,7 +1594,8 @@ int amdgpu_cs_find_mapping(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *parser,
> *map = mapping;
>
> /* Double check that the BO is reserved by this CS */
> - if (READ_ONCE((*bo)->tbo.resv->lock.ctx) != &parser->ticket)
> + if (!ww_mutex_is_owned_by(&(*bo)->tbo.resv->lock, current,
> + &parser->ticket))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!((*bo)->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> index 39fda195bf78..dd580db289e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> @@ -358,4 +358,21 @@ static inline bool ww_mutex_is_locked(struct ww_mutex *lock)
> return mutex_is_locked(&lock->base);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * ww_mutex_is_owned_by - is the w/w mutex locked by this task in that context
> + * @lock: the mutex to be queried
> + * @task: the task structure to check
> + * @ctx: the w/w acquire context to test
> + *
> + * Returns true if the mutex is locked in the context by the given task, false
> + * otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool ww_mutex_is_owned_by(struct ww_mutex *lock,
> + struct task_struct *task,
> + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + return likely(__mutex_owner(&lock->base) == task) &&
> + READ_ONCE(lock->ctx) == ctx;
> +}
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.14.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists