linux-kernel - Re: linux acpi (thunderbolt? bug)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1802150948530.1673@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:52:06 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Yuriy Vostrikov <delamonpansie@...il.com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux acpi (thunderbolt? bug)

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Yuriy Vostrikov wrote:
> > after sleep 1 time
> > name:   VECTOR
> >  size:   0
> >  mapped: 35
> >  flags:  0x00000041
> > Online bitmaps:        2
> > Global available:    385
> > Global reserved:      12
> > Total allocated:      32
> > System: 41: 0-19,32,50,128,238-255
> >  | CPU | avl | man | act | vectors
> >      0   185     1    18  33-43,46-49,51-53
> >      1   200     1     3  33-37
> 
> The accounting is already screwed. CPU1 claims to have 3 allocated vectors,
> but the allocation bitmap has 5 bits set !?! 
> 
> I have no idea yet how that can happen. Lemme stare into the code some more
> and I came back to you.

Still confused.

Does this happen if you boot w/o the thunderbolt thingy and then do
suspend/resume cycles?

Can you please take snapshots from:

    /proc/interrupts
    /sys/kernel/debug/irq/*

right after boot, after the unplug, before suspend and after resume?

Thanks,

	tglx