lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180215095337.fccoozdclfnbepi4@8bytes.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:53:38 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add Intel IOMMU debugfs support

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:53:32PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> We did start out with /dev/mem but run into CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM
> requirement which is turned on by default.
> libpci is only limited to PCI config space access, right?

Even if /dev/mem is not an option, I am still not convinced that this is
a good idea. How should this be used? Will you just use it to debug
Intel IOMMUs when you guys work on the driver or should users report the
data back when they hit problems?



	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ