linux-kernel - [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:25:11 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        dsafonov@...tuozzo.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in
 single_step_syscall.c

Commit-ID:  4105c69703cdeba76f384b901712c9397b04e9c2
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/4105c69703cdeba76f384b901712c9397b04e9c2
Author:     Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:13:21 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 01:15:48 +0100

selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c

On 64-bit builds, we should not rely on "int $0x80" working (it only does if
CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y is enabled). To keep the "Set TF and check int80"
test running on 64-bit installs with CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y enabled, build
this test only if we can also build 32-bit binaries (which should be a
good approximation for that).

Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shuah@...nel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180211111013.16888-5-linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile              | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
index 91fbfa8..73b8ef6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
@@ -30,11 +30,13 @@ CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./check_cc.sh $(CC) trivial_64bit_program.c)
 ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386),1)
 all: all_32
 TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_32)
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DCAN_BUILD_32
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_X86_64),1)
 all: all_64
 TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_64)
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DCAN_BUILD_64
 endif
 
 all_32: $(BINARIES_32)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
index a48da95..ddfdd63 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
@@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ static void check_result(void)
 
 int main()
 {
+#ifdef CAN_BUILD_32
 	int tmp;
+#endif
 
 	sethandler(SIGTRAP, sigtrap, 0);
 
@@ -139,12 +141,13 @@ int main()
 		      : : "c" (post_nop) : "r11");
 	check_result();
 #endif
-
+#ifdef CAN_BUILD_32
 	printf("[RUN]\tSet TF and check int80\n");
 	set_eflags(get_eflags() | X86_EFLAGS_TF);
 	asm volatile ("int $0x80" : "=a" (tmp) : "a" (SYS_getpid)
 			: INT80_CLOBBERS);
 	check_result();
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * This test is particularly interesting if fast syscalls use