[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180215021321.GB30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 02:13:21 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: John Pittman <jpittman@...hat.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Change 'unsigned' to 'unsigned int' throughout
block layer
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:37:02PM -0500, John Pittman wrote:
> In quite a few files throughout the block layer, the bare 'unsigned' is
> used rather than the preferred 'unsigned int'.
Preferred by whom?
> The issue was
What is that "issue" and why is it a problem in the first place?
> exposed by checkpatch.pl. Warnings encountered were:
Oh, good - so presumably it does have some explanations beyond "The Most Holy
checkpatch.pl Spake Unto Us"; could the esteemed sir share those with us?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists