[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180215151708.961123461@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:15:56 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 065/195] [Variant 2/Spectre-v2] arm64: cpufeature: __this_cpu_has_cap() shouldnt stop early
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Commit edf298cfce47 upstream.
this_cpu_has_cap() tests caps->desc not caps->matches, so it stops
walking the list when it finds a 'silent' feature, instead of
walking to the end of the list.
Prior to v4.6's 644c2ae198412 ("arm64: cpufeature: Test 'matches' pointer
to find the end of the list") we always tested desc to find the end of
a capability list. This was changed for dubious things like PAN_NOT_UAO.
v4.7's e3661b128e53e ("arm64: Allow a capability to be checked on
single CPU") added this_cpu_has_cap() using the old desc style test.
CC: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1102,9 +1102,8 @@ static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const str
if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
return false;
- for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
+ for (caps = cap_array; caps->matches; caps++)
if (caps->capability == cap &&
- caps->matches &&
caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU))
return true;
return false;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists