linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.15 134/202] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Drop locks before reading guest memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180215151720.160232830@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:17:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.15 134/202] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Drop locks before reading guest memory

4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>

commit 36ee41d161c67a6fcf696d4817a0da31f778938c upstream.

Running with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP reveals that HV KVM tries to
read guest memory, in order to emulate guest instructions, while
preempt is disabled and a vcore lock is held.  This occurs in
kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(), called from post_guest_process(), when
emulating guest doorbell instructions on POWER9 systems, and also
when checking whether we have hit a hypervisor breakpoint.
Reading guest memory can cause a page fault and thus cause the
task to sleep, so we need to avoid reading guest memory while
holding a spinlock or when preempt is disabled.

To fix this, we move the preempt_enable() in kvmppc_run_core() to
before the loop that calls post_guest_process() for each vcore that
has just run, and we drop and re-take the vcore lock around the calls
to kvmppc_emulate_debug_inst() and kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr().

Dropping the lock is safe with respect to the iteration over the
runnable vcpus in post_guest_process(); for_each_runnable_thread
is actually safe to use locklessly.  It is possible for a vcpu
to become runnable and add itself to the runnable_threads array
(code near the beginning of kvmppc_run_vcpu()) and then get included
in the iteration in post_guest_process despite the fact that it
has not just run.  This is benign because vcpu->arch.trap and
vcpu->arch.ceded will be zero.

Fixes: 579006944e0d ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Virtualize doorbell facility on POWER9")
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1005,8 +1005,6 @@ static int kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *tvcpu;

-	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 	if (kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &inst) != EMULATE_DONE)
 		return RESUME_GUEST;
 	if (get_op(inst) != 31)
@@ -1056,6 +1054,7 @@ static int kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr
 	return RESUME_GUEST;
 }

+/* Called with vcpu->arch.vcore->lock held */
 static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				 struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
@@ -1176,7 +1175,10 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct
 				swab32(vcpu->arch.emul_inst) :
 				vcpu->arch.emul_inst;
 		if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP) {
+			/* Need vcore unlocked to call kvmppc_get_last_inst */
+			spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.vcore->lock);
 			r = kvmppc_emulate_debug_inst(run, vcpu);
+			spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.vcore->lock);
 		} else {
 			kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
 			r = RESUME_GUEST;
@@ -1191,8 +1193,13 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct
 	 */
 	case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_FAC_UNAVAIL:
 		r = EMULATE_FAIL;
-		if ((vcpu->arch.hfscr >> 56) == FSCR_MSGP_LG)
+		if (((vcpu->arch.hfscr >> 56) == FSCR_MSGP_LG) &&
+		    cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+			/* Need vcore unlocked to call kvmppc_get_last_inst */
+			spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.vcore->lock);
 			r = kvmppc_emulate_doorbell_instr(vcpu);
+			spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.vcore->lock);
+		}
 		if (r == EMULATE_FAIL) {
 			kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
 			r = RESUME_GUEST;
@@ -2934,13 +2941,14 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_run_core(str
 	/* make sure updates to secondary vcpu structs are visible now */
 	smp_mb();

+	preempt_enable();
+
 	for (sub = 0; sub < core_info.n_subcores; ++sub) {
 		pvc = core_info.vc[sub];
 		post_guest_process(pvc, pvc == vc);
 	}

 	spin_lock(&vc->lock);
-	preempt_enable();

  out:
 	vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE;