[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180215165809.mjmzmwxxd63mmuf4@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:58:10 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Levin Alexander <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Radu Rendec <rrendec@...sta.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] softirq: Per vector deferment to workqueue
On 2018-02-15 17:13:52 [+0100], Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Yeah that makes sense. These workqueues are too much headaches eventually.
> I'm going to try that ksoftirqd thing.
I may have something for that USB problem, I just need some testing
before posting…
> Thanks.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists