[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180215170104.GC25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:01:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] posix-timers: Protect posix clock array access
against speculation
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:21:55PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The clockid argument of clockid_to_kclock() comes straight from user space
> via various syscalls and is used as index into the posix_clocks array.
>
> Protect it against spectre v1 array out of bounds speculation. Remove the
> redundant check for !posix_clock[id] as this is another source for
> speculation and does not provide any advantage over the return
> posix_clock[id] path which returns NULL in that case anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
It might also be useful to figure out why the automation didn't flag
this one, its about as trivial as it gets.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists