linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzMGDrXPL1zCRCRFM9QG5VoJ3dk-A9k0sVogNAQgqF+Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:04:56 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I do use it, I take the commits from there and then queue them up as
> individual patches for the stable releases.
>
> And if it wasn't there, the conflict resolution would have to be on my
> side, making them "not the same commits in the end", so either I have to
> do that, or you do :)

Ok, as long as it helps something, I'm ok with it. I was just
questioning whether it was just extra work.

                   Linus