[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180216081127.GE25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:11:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64/v4.16-rc1: KASAN: use-after-free Read in finish_task_switch
Please trim..
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:02:42AM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > My current theory: do_exit() gets preempted after having set current->mm
> > to NULL, and after having issued mmput(), which brings the mm_count down
> > to 0.
No it doesn't..
remember, the last thread of a process enters with:
mm_count == 1 && mm_users == 1
exit_mm() then does mmgrab():
mm_count == 2 && mm_users == 1
we then do mmput(), which results in:
mm_count == 1 && mm_users == 0
That last mm_count is for ->active_mm, and will be dropped once we
schedule to a next user task.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists