[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e1f34ae-54d3-8daf-e531-976f36f3cb07@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:52:16 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] power: supply: Fix AXP288 fallback when not needed
Hi,
On 16-02-18 09:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16-02-18 09:26, Carlo Caione wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Carlo Caione <carlo@...lessm.com>
>>>
>>> With commits af3ec837 and dccfae6d a blacklist was introduced to avoid
>>> using the ACPI drivers for AC and battery when a native PMIC driver was
>>> already present. While this is in general a good idea (because of broken
>>> DSDT or proprietary and undocumented ACPI opregions for the ACPI
>>> AC/battery devices) we have come across at least one CherryTrail laptop
>>> (ECS EF20EA) shipping the AXP288 together with a separate FG controller
>>> (a MAX17047) instead of the one embedded in the AXP288.
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the new version. This looks good and surprisingly
>> clean / small given amounts of warts surrounding this all.
>>
>> The entire series is:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> Well, to be honest, I very much prefer it when changes are made to one
> driver at a time.
I understand completely, Carlo can you do a v4 with the changes
Rafael requested please? Feel free to keep my Reviewed-by for the v4.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists