[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25deaf48-6590-4ca2-e0db-adaef1f49c5d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:37:55 +0530
From: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
To: frowand.list@...il.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: add early boot allocation of
of_find_node_by_phandle() cache
On 2/15/2018 6:14 AM, frowand.list@...il.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>
> The initial implementation of the of_find_node_by_phandle() cache
> allocates the cache using kcalloc(). Add an early boot allocation
> of the cache so it will be usable during early boot. Switch over
> to the kcalloc() based cache once normal memory allocation
> becomes available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is optional, to be added at Rob's discretion. The
> extra complexity is not as much as I had feared, but the boot
> speed up is also likely small.
>
> drivers/of/base.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 2 ++
> drivers/of/of_private.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index ab545dfa9173..d7b1ff1209e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,11 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "OF: " fmt
>
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> #include <linux/console.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> @@ -131,6 +133,29 @@ static void of_populate_phandle_cache(void)
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
> }
>
> +void __init of_populate_phandle_cache_early(void)
> +{
> + u32 cache_entries;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + u32 phandles = 0;
> + size_t size;
> +
> + for_each_of_allnodes(np)
> + if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL)
> + phandles++;
> +
> + cache_entries = roundup_pow_of_two(phandles);
> + phandle_cache_mask = cache_entries - 1;
> +
> + size = cache_entries * sizeof(*phandle_cache);
> + phandle_cache = memblock_virt_alloc(size, 4);
> + memset(phandle_cache, 0, size);
> +
> + for_each_of_allnodes(np)
> + if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL)
> + phandle_cache[np->phandle & phandle_cache_mask] = np;
> +}
There is a lot of code duplication in this function with
of_populate_phandle_cache. Would you think of taking out
common code or differ the function with extra bool parameter
to say 'early' or 'not early'.
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_MODULES
> static int __init of_free_phandle_cache(void)
> {
> @@ -150,7 +175,15 @@ static int __init of_free_phandle_cache(void)
>
> void __init of_core_init(void)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> struct device_node *np;
> + phys_addr_t size;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
> + size = (phandle_cache_mask + 1) * sizeof(*phandle_cache);
> + memblock_free(__pa(phandle_cache), size);
> + phandle_cache = NULL;
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
>
> of_populate_phandle_cache();
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index 84aa9d676375..cb320df23f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -1264,6 +1264,8 @@ void __init unflatten_device_tree(void)
> of_alias_scan(early_init_dt_alloc_memory_arch);
>
> unittest_unflatten_overlay_base();
> +
> + of_populate_phandle_cache_early();
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_private.h b/drivers/of/of_private.h
> index fa70650136b4..6720448c84cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_private.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ extern void __of_sysfs_remove_bin_file(struct device_node *np,
> /* illegal phandle value (set when unresolved) */
> #define OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL 0xdeadbeef
>
> +extern void __init of_populate_phandle_cache_early(void);
> +
> /* iterators for transactions, used for overlays */
> /* forward iterator */
> #define for_each_transaction_entry(_oft, _te) \
>
Chintan
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists