[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518785796.9517.25.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:56:36 +0000
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
To: "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com" <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>,
"Michael.Hennerich@...log.com" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition
arguments
Hi Rodrigo,
I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
>
> + int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> + int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);
Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.
thanks,
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists