[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180216134448.GI5886@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:44:48 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 02:25:38PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:30:08AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why are we adding a separate DT node with no content for this? This is
> > a single chip, we already know that the CODEC part is there from the DT
> > telling us that the chip is there and what we decide is part of the
> > CODEC is going to depend on what the OS running on the system is doing.
> While it looks empty in the DT binding file, it's actually not empty
> once some standard properties are added to support audio-graph-card.
This tells me you're missing something in the binding defining the DAIs
and...
> A real world example looks like this:
> &cpcap {
> audio-codec {
> compatible = "motorola,cpcap-audio-codec";
> #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
...that still doesn't require a compatible here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists