[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9ba9ac773f4f9e60770bd9169b0e46ac974d858a.1518788761.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:48:20 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] drm: intel_dpio_phy: fix kernel-doc comments at nested struct
The in-lined comments for channel.port doesn't follow the syntax
described at kernel-doc document, causing the following warning:
$ ./scripts/kernel-doc -none drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c:154: warning: Function parameter or member 'channel.port' not described in 'bxt_ddi_phy_info'
While the best would be for the Kernel to deduce that from the
context, supporting it is not trivial. So, let's just stick with
the existing syntax.
Reported-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Tested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
index 76473e9836c6..c8e9e44e5981 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ struct bxt_ddi_phy_info {
*/
struct {
/**
- * @port: which port maps to this channel.
+ * @channel.port: which port maps to this channel.
*/
enum port port;
} channel[2];
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists