linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd2sDgsv6kOpx7T6PrQ1cwi9Xqxzw+8bh_rYJr=RScmQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:50:34 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Steve Presser <steve@...ssers.name>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
        Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Steve Presser <steve@...ssers.name> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> No good news. It looks like the vanilla 4.15 series doesn't boot on this
> system. Still working on tracking down why/when it broke/if this is due to a
> Debian patch.

Just in case: you may cherry-pick necessary patches (4 or 5 from the
tip of mentioned branch) to whatever kernel you are using. Though I'm
not sure how far v4.15 from v4.12 in a sense of the code it touches.

> Would it still be an effective test if I backported the changes to 4.12 (or
> 4.12-debian)? I know that series boots.

OK, continue waiting for your testing.

>> >> Here [1] is the branch with another approach. Can you test it and tell
>> >> if it fixes the issue?
>> >>
>> >> [1]: https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/branch/topic/iio-acpi
>> >> It's based on linux-next + compiletest branch of IIO subsystem.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko