[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180216235506.GA26546@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:55:06 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rwright@....com,
maurice.a.saldivar@....com, mingo@...nel.org,
marcus.folkesson@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] watchdog/hpwdt: Programable Pretimeout NMI
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 04:46:17PM -0700, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:34:40PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:43:57PM -0700, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> > > Make whether or not the hpwdt watchdog delivers a pretimeout NMI
> > > programable by the user.
> > >
> > > The underlying iLO hardware is programmable as to whether or not
> > > a pre-timeout NMI is delivered to the system before the iLO resets
> > > the system. However, the iLO does not allow for programming the
> > > length of time that NMI is delivered before the system is reset.
> > >
> > > Hence, in hpwdt_set_pretimeout, val == 0 disables the NMI. Any
> > > non-zero value sets the pretimeout length to what the hardware
> > > supports.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> > > index da9a04101814..dc0ad20738ed 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> > > @@ -28,12 +28,15 @@
> > > #define TICKS_TO_SECS(ticks) ((ticks) * 128 / 1000)
> > > #define HPWDT_MAX_TIMER TICKS_TO_SECS(65535)
> > > #define DEFAULT_MARGIN 30
> > > +#define PRETIMEOUT_SEC 9
> > >
> > > static unsigned int soft_margin = DEFAULT_MARGIN; /* in seconds */
> > > -static unsigned int reload; /* the computed soft_margin */
> > > static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_HPWDT_NMI_DECODING
> > > static unsigned int allow_kdump = 1;
> > > +static bool pretimeout = 1;
> > > +#else
> > > +static bool pretimeout;
> > > #endif
> > >
> > static bool pretimeout = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HPWDT_NMI_DECODING);
>
> ack. will do.
>
> >
> > > static void __iomem *pci_mem_addr; /* the PCI-memory address */
> > > @@ -55,10 +58,12 @@ static struct watchdog_device hpwdt_dev;
> > > */
> > > static int hpwdt_start(struct watchdog_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > - reload = SECS_TO_TICKS(dev->timeout);
> > > + int control = 0x81 | (pretimeout ? 0x4 : 0);
> > > + int reload = SECS_TO_TICKS(dev->timeout);
> > >
> > > + dev_dbg(dev->parent, "start watchdog 0x%08x:0x%02x\n", reload, control);
> > > iowrite16(reload, hpwdt_timer_reg);
> > > - iowrite8(0x85, hpwdt_timer_con);
> > > + iowrite8(control, hpwdt_timer_con);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -67,6 +72,8 @@ static int hpwdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > unsigned long data;
> > >
> > > + dev_dbg(dev->parent, "stop watchdog\n");
> > > +
> > Unrelated.
> >
> > > data = ioread8(hpwdt_timer_con);
> > > data &= 0xFE;
> > > iowrite8(data, hpwdt_timer_con);
> > > @@ -75,8 +82,9 @@ static int hpwdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *dev)
> > >
> > > static int hpwdt_ping(struct watchdog_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > - reload = SECS_TO_TICKS(dev->timeout);
> > > + int reload = SECS_TO_TICKS(dev->timeout);
> > >
> > > + dev_dbg(dev->parent, "ping watchdog 0x%08x\n", reload);
> >
> > Unrelated. If you want to add debug messages, please do it
> > in a separate patch.
>
>
> Different patch, but same set? I'll move these (and ones from earlier
> patch to a new separate patch later in set.)
>
> >
> > > iowrite16(reload, hpwdt_timer_reg);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > @@ -98,12 +106,21 @@ static int hpwdt_settimeout(struct watchdog_device *dev, unsigned int val)
> > > }
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_HPWDT_NMI_DECODING /* { */
> > > +static int hpwdt_set_pretimeout(struct watchdog_device *dev, unsigned int val)
> > > +{
> > > + if (val && (val != PRETIMEOUT_SEC)) {
> >
> > Unnecessary ( )
>
>
> There are several things going on here. I'm not sure which one the above
> comment is intended.
>
The "Unnecessary" refers to the ( ) around the second part of the expression
above. While there may be valid reasons to include extra ( ), I think we
can trust the C compiler to get it right here.
> While a pretimeout NMI isn't required by the HW to be enabled, if enabled the
> length of pretimeout is fixed by HW.
>
> I didn't see anything in the API that would allow us to communicate to
> the user this "feature." timeout at leasst has both min_timeout and max_timeout, but
> I didn't see similar for pretimeout. I also don't think its reasonable to fail
> here if the requested value is not 9 as the user really has no way of knowing what
> the valid range of pretimeout values are. So I accept, any non-zero value
> for pretimeout, but then set pretimeout to be 9.
>
> But at the same time, I don't like to siliently change a human request
> w/o at least warning.
>
Sorry, I lost you here.
> >
> > The actual timeout can be a value smaller than 9 seconds.
> > Minimum is 1 second. What happens if the user configures
> > a timeout of less than 9 seconds as well as a pretimeout ?
> > Will it fire immediately ?
>
> The architecture is silient on this issue. My experience with
> this is that if timeout < 9 seconds, the NMI is not issued.
> System resets when the timeout expires. This could be implementation
> dependent.
>
> Note, this is not a new issue.
>
Bad argument.
> I thought about setting the min timeout to ten seconds to avoid this situation.
>
You could reject reject request to set the pretimeout to a value <= the
timeout.
> I haven't dug into the various user level clients of watchdog so I'm not sure
> what the impact of making this change would be to them.
>
>
> >
> > > + dev_info(dev->parent, "Setting pretimeout to %d\n", PRETIMEOUT_SEC);
> >
> > Please no ongoing logging noise. This can easily be abused to clog
> > the kernel log.
>
> Good point. I will look at WARN_ONCE or something similar.
>
A traceback if someone sets a bad timeout ? That would be even worse.
Guenter
> >
> > > + val = PRETIMEOUT_SEC;
> > > + }
> > > + dev->pretimeout = val;
> > > + pretimeout = val ? 1 : 0;
> >
> > pretimeout = !!val;
> >
>
> --
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists