[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180217103848.yiutigxpukxfbtze@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 11:38:48 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] jump_label: Explicitly disable jump labels in
__init code
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> +/* Disable any jump label entries in __init code */
> +void __init jump_label_invalidate_init(void)
> +{
> + struct jump_entry *iter_start = __start___jump_table;
> + struct jump_entry *iter_stop = __stop___jump_table;
> + struct jump_entry *iter;
> +
> + for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++)
> + if (iter->code >= (unsigned long)_sinittext &&
> + iter->code < (unsigned long)_einittext)
> + iter->code = 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Disable any jump label entries in module init code */
> static void jump_label_invalidate_module_init(struct module *mod)
> {
> struct jump_entry *iter_start = mod->jump_entries;
> struct jump_entry *iter_stop = iter_start + mod->num_jump_entries;
> struct jump_entry *iter;
>
> - for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++) {
> + for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++)
> if (within_module_init(iter->code, mod))
> iter->code = 0;
> - }
Why did you remove the curly braces? They are canonical kernel style for
multi-line statements.
The new jump_label_invalidate_init() function has that problem too.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists