lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180217161746.GC3231@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:17:46 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Joe Konno <joe.konno@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
        Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@...fitbricks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efivars: reading variables can generate SMIs

> Would rate limiting (but not only for non-root) help mitigate Spectre
> v1 issues in UEFI runtime services code as well? I have been looking
> into unmapping the entire kernel while such calls are in progress,
> because firmware is likely to remain vulnerable long after the OSes
> have been fixed, and we may be able to kill two birds with one stone
> here (and not break userland in the process)

Yes a global rate limit would seem like a good compromise.

-Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ