linux-kernel - Re: [v3,06/11] watchdog/hpwdt: Select WATCHDOG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180217200841.GB27788@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:   Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:08:41 -0700
From:   Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rwright@....com,
        maurice.a.saldivar@....com, mingo@...nel.org,
        marcus.folkesson@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v3,06/11] watchdog/hpwdt: Select WATCHDOG_CORE

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 08:21:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:43:55PM -0700, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> > Update Kconfig file to show that hpwdt now selects WATCHDOG_CORE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
> 
> At this point, WATCHDOG_CORE is not required. This patch should
> be merged with the next patch, which adds the requirement.
> 
> Since it appears that you insist on having it as separate patch,
> deferring to Wim.
> 

I have no objection to squashing these two commits once we have
agreed upon the actual changes being made.

I re-ordered to address the bisectability question, but kept them
separate as it is a little bit easier for me to rework patches if
the patch contains only a single file.


-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann                  Software Engineer   Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------