linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180219101050.0a1514e5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:10:50 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c

between commit:

  117172c8f9d4 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  b7a3f33bd5ab ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Drop request reference for the signaler thread")

from the drm tree.

These are basically identical for the conflicting section except that
the former added a line:

	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));

which I left in.

I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped