[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180218233453.ytvuvggnzx5rhbls@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:34:53 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, briannorris@...gle.com,
dtor@...gle.com, dianders@...gle.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: gpio-keys - allow setting wakeup interrupt
trigger type in DT
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:42:47PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Jeffy,
>
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 07:55:09PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> > Allow specifying a different interrupt trigger type for wakeup when
> > using the gpio-keys input device as a wakeup source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> > index a94940481e55..61926cef708f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> > @@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ Optional subnode-properties:
> > If not specified defaults to 5.
> > - wakeup-source: Boolean, button can wake-up the system.
> > (Legacy property supported: "gpio-key,wakeup")
> > + - wakeup-trigger-type: Specifies the interrupt trigger type for wakeup.
> > + The value is defined in <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>
> Do you really want to codify interrupt triggers here? It seems like most
> of the information about edge vs. level is already codified elsewhere,
> so this becomes a little redundant. And in fact, some bindings may be
> specifying a "gpio", not technically an interrupt (at least not
> directly), so it feels weird to apply IRQ_* flags to them right here.
> Anyway, I think he only piece you really want to describe here is, do we
> wake on "event asserted", "event deasserted", or both. (The "none" case
> would just mean you shouldn't have the "wakeup-source" property.)
>
> So maybe:
>
> wakeup-trigger-type: Specifies whether the key should wake the
> system when asserted, when deasserted, or both. This property is
> only valid for keys that wake up the system (e.g., when the
> "wakeup-source" property is also provided). Supported values
> are:
> 1: asserted
As wakeup is an IRQ, that's assumed.
> 2: deasserted
Just invert the flags for the IRQ.
> 3: both asserted and deasserted
I don't see what would be the usecase. But wouldn't this be any edge
(because level certainly doesn't make sense)?
>
> ? We could still make macros out of those, if we want
> (input/linux-event-codes.h?). And then leave it up to the driver to
> determine how to translate that into the appropriate edge or level
> triggers.
>
> Brian
>
> > + Only the following flags are supported:
> > + IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > + IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> > + IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> > + IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> > - linux,can-disable: Boolean, indicates that button is connected
> > to dedicated (not shared) interrupt which can be disabled to
> > suppress events from the button.
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists