[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5809df9-fc17-03da-b7f4-038d973dbd1f@c-s.fr>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:14:24 +0100
From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] crypto: talitos - do hw_context DMA mapping outside
the requests
Le 19/02/2018 à 09:30, Horia Geantă a écrit :
> On 2/19/2018 9:58 AM, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>> Le 18/02/2018 à 18:14, Horia Geantă a écrit :
>>> There is no ahash_exit() callback mirroring ahash_init().
>>>
>>> The clean-up of request ctx should be done in the last states of the hash flows
>>> described here:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/crypto/devel-algos.html#cipher-definition-with-struct-shash-alg-and-ahash-alg
>>> for e.g. in the final() callback.
>>
>> Unfortunatly it seems that we can't rely on those finalising functions
>> being called all the time.
>> If you look into test_ahash_jiffies() for instance, in case of error the
>> call of crypto_hash_final() is skipped.
>
> If test_ahash_jiffies() errors before calling crypto_ahash_final(req), this
> means a previous callback failed.
> Accordingly, DMA unmapping should be performed also on the corresponding errors
> paths in the driver.
>
And what about ALGIF path from user space ?
What if the user never calls the last sendmsg() which will call
hash_finup() ?
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists