[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180219092017.GN25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:20:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before
calling into firmware
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:26:16AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Note that PeterZ was struggling with intermittent boot hangs yesterday as well,
> which hangs came and went during severeal (fruitless) bisection attempts. Then at
> a certain point the hangs went away altogether.
>
> The symptoms for both his and your hangs are consistent with an alignment
> dependent bug.
Mine would consistently hang right after
"Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 44K"
At one point I bisected it to commit:
a06cc94f3f8d ("x86/build: Drop superfluous ALIGN from the linker script")
But shortly thereafter I started having trouble reproducing, and now I
can run kernels that before would consistently fail to boot :/
> My other guess is that it's perhaps somehow microcode related?
I did not update or otherwise change packages while I was bisecting; the
machine is:
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 62
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
stepping : 4
microcode : 0x428
Like I wrote on IRC; what _seems_ to have 'cured' things is clearing out
my /boot. The amount of kernels generated by the bisect was immense and
running 'update-grub' was taking _much_ longer than actually building a
new kernel.
What I have not tried is again generating and installing that many
kernels to see if that will make it go 'funny' again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists