[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87371xb8gb.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:05:40 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for in-line nested struct comments
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:48:14 -0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:
>
>> his series fix two bugs at kernel-doc.rst examples and add support
>> for in-line nested struct comments.
>>
>> It also converts one documentation at intel_dpio_phy to use it,
>> in order to give a practical example about how to use it.
>
> OK, I've applied everything but the last patch, which I assume will go
> through the DRM tree.
I was going to reference the kernel-doc commit while applying patch 6,
but I can't find the others. I guess applied literally meant just
applied, not pushed... ;)
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists