linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 05/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:44:43 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
        Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Loc Ho <lho@....com>,
        Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
        Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to
 enumerate protocol devices



On 19/02/18 11:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL
>> +int scmi_driver_register(struct scmi_driver *driver,
>> +                        struct module *owner, const char *mod_name);
>> +void scmi_driver_unregister(struct scmi_driver *driver);
>> +#else
>> +static int scmi_driver_register(struct scmi_driver *driver,
>> +                               struct module *owner, const char *mod_name)
>> +{
>> +       return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +static void scmi_driver_unregister(struct scmi_driver *driver) {}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL */
> 
> The dummy helpers must be 'static inline', not just 'static', otherwise you
> get a warning when this header is included by a file that doesn't call
> both of them.
> 

Thanks, fixed locally now.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep