[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b8948d24-3351-2a8c-de2a-1c1c94685778@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:01:19 -0500
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@...il.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/console: enable dummy console for vt
On 02/19/2018 08:37 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 02/19/2018 02:35 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/15/2018 07:02 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2018 12:57 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 15.02.2018 12:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Christian Borntraeger
>>>>> <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> To enable the virtual terminal layer with virtio-gpu, we need to
>>>>>> provide the dummy console. This console is hidden behind CONFIG_IOMEM
>>>>>> via the graphics support. Instead of fully enabling the graphic
>>>>>> drivers lets just provide a Kconfig option for the dummy console.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> New version: instead of moving around the graphic and console stuff,
>>>>>> let's just keep an s390 specific variant of CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE
>>>>>> arch/s390/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>>>>>> index cbe1d978693a..a69690f616f3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -952,6 +952,11 @@ config S390_HYPFS_FS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> source "arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +config DUMMY_CONSOLE
>>>>>> + bool
>>>>>> + depends on VT
>>>>>> + default y
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> config S390_GUEST
>>>>>> def_bool y
>>>>>> prompt "s390 support for virtio devices"
>>>>>
>>>>> Really?
>>>>>
>>>>> You already have your own copy of HAS_IOMEM, which makes it hard for
>>>>> people to track which one applies where.
>>>>
>>>> I think I agree with Geert - let's better fix this in a proper way
>>>> instead of doing hacks like this. I guess there will be other
>>>> architectures in the future that might want to use the dummy console
>>>> without CONFIG_IOMEM, so fixing this in drivers/video/ instead sounds
>>>> better to me.
>>>
>>> The question is, what is the proper fix?
>>>
>>
>> How about we only fence off sub menu items such as DRM or GPU or Fbdev, which actually uses io memory, in drivers/video/Kconfig? Similar to what Thomas suggested for moving the CONFIG_IOMEM dependency for fbdevs?
>
> Can you spin a patch?
>
Yes, I will post it as V3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists