[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1519053862.22495.396.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:24:22 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc: "Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] lib/test_printf: Mark big constant with ULL
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 13:58 +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:07:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Sparse complains that constant is so bit for unsigned long on 64-bit
> > architecture.
> >
> > lib/test_printf.c:217:54: warning: constant 0xffff0123456789ab is so
> > big it is unsigned long
> > lib/test_printf.c:246:54: warning: constant 0xffff0123456789ab is so
> > big it is unsigned long
> >
> > To satisfy everyone, mark the constant with ULL.
>
> It should be 'UL' not 'ULL' since for architectures a pointer and
> a unsigned long have the ame size while on 32bit archs, long long
> are (or may?) 64bit.
Yes, UL works as well.
Andrew, tell me if I need to send an update (followup) or a new version.
Btw, I ran test_printf suite on both 32- and 64-bit code, everything
passed. So, if anyone notices a regression, please, create a test case
that we may run.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists