[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aV_v6zNS6Ac1u1cB2GZ7QhjNxBeg0FNabUhrndt5CqZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:59:43 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...onical.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@...ia.com>,
Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@...cle.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: hang in unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/30/18 1:57 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>>>> On 1/30/18 1:08 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>> On 01/30/2018 07:32 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following program creates a hang in unregister_netdevice.
>>>>>>> cleanup_net work hangs there forever periodically printing
>>>>>>> "unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 3"
>>>>>>> and creation of any new network namespaces hangs forever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interestingly, this is not reproducible on net-next.
>>>>>
>>>>> The most recent change on netns refcnt was 4ee806d51176 ("net: tcp: close
>>>>> sock if net namespace is exiting") in net/net-next from 5 days ago, maybe
>>>>> fixed due to that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This appears to be the commit introducing the refcnt leak:
>>>>
>>>> $ git bisect bad
>>>> dbc2b5e9a09e9a6664679a667ff81cff6e5f2641 is the first bad commit
>>>> commit dbc2b5e9a09e9a6664679a667ff81cff6e5f2641
>>>> Author: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
>>>> Date: Fri May 12 14:39:52 2017 +0800
>>>>
>>>> sctp: fix src address selection if using secondary addresses for ipv6
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v4.14 is bad. Running bisect in the background while doing other things....
>>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting. The commit that avoids the refcnt leak is
>>>
>>> commit 955ec4cb3b54c7c389a9f830be7d3ae2056b9212
>>> Author: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>>> Date: Wed Jan 24 19:45:29 2018 -0800
>>>
>>> net/ipv6: Do not allow route add with a device that is down
>>>
>>> That commit does not intentionally address the problem so it is just
>>> masking the problematic code introduced by the commit above.
>> Thanks, David A.
>>
>> I'm still on a trip. will look into this asap.
>
> Alexey and Tommi already had the patches for this issue on
> both SCTP v4 and v6 dst_get, Thanks.
Is this meant to be fixed already? I am still seeing this on the
latest upstream tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists