[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180220073712.6kfoxc4pet4o2cgx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:37:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] x86/entry/64: open-code switch_to_thread_stack
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> > -.macro DO_SWITCH_TO_THREAD_STACK
> > +/* 8(%rsp): ~(interrupt number) */
> > +ENTRY(interrupt_helper)
>
> "interrupt_helper" is a bit vague, how about "interrupt_entry"? That
> better describes its purpose and also makes it more analagous to
> paranoid_entry() and error_entry().
Yeah, interrupt_entry() sounds better - and the renaming should be propagated to
the other patches as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists