linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:44:15 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
cc:     karahmed@...zon.de, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        jmattson@...gle.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before
 calling into firmware

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, David Woodhouse wrote:

> Retpoline means the kernel is safe because it has no indirect branches.
> But firmware isn't, so use IBRS for firmware calls if it's available.
> 
> Block preemption while IBRS is set, although in practice the call sites
> already had to be doing that.
> 
> Ignore hpwdt.c for now. It's taking spinlocks and calling into firmware
> code, from an NMI handler. I don't want to touch that with a bargepole.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>