linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: consider effective protection attributes in W+X check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5A8BEDBE02000078001A9763@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 01:43:26 -0700
From:   "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:     "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        "Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: consider effective protection
 attributes in W+X check

>>> On 20.02.18 at 09:37, <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'll see what I can do; it's a pity that the change here, which had
>> been sent weeks ago and is a bug fix, hadn't gone in before that
>> other change (being more an improvement than a bug fix).
> 
> When was it submitted, got a link or Message-ID of the previous submission?

On Dec 12th (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10106593/).

Jan