[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVMoEuOOffRNHDa0JwaLH1auByOQfNW8DgkXGaq5GFnsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:49:41 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
arcml <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] serial: imx: Fix out-of-bounds access through DT alias
Hi Uwe,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> The imx_ports[] array is indexed using a value derived from the
>> "serialN" alias in DT, which may lead to an out-of-bounds access.
>>
>> Fix this by adding a range check.
>>
>> Fixes: 9206ab8a0350c3da ("serial: imx: Fix out-of-bounds access through DT alias")
>
> huh, this patch fixes itself?
Oops
Fixes: ff05967a07225ab6 ("serial/imx: add of_alias_get_id() reference back")
>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
>> index 1d7ca382bc12b238..e89e90ad87d8245c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
>> @@ -2041,6 +2041,11 @@ static int serial_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> serial_imx_probe_pdata(sport, pdev);
>> else if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>
> I'd prefer an empty line here.
OK
>> + if (sport->port.line >= UART_NR) {
>
> I would have used:
>
> if (sport->port.line >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_ports))
>
> which IMHO is better understandable
OK.
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "serial%d out of range\n",
>> + sport->port.line);
>
> Note that the same overflow can happen when a device is probed using
> platform data (and your commit fixes that, too). Maybe worth to point
> out in the commit log?
That's correct. But board code is tied more intimate to the kernel.
Will update.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists