linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: add ww_mutex_is_owned_by function v4

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <20180220151040.rmnxftdwrkooelob@imgtec.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:10:40 +0000
From:   Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@...tec.com>
To:     Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
CC:     <peterz@...radead.org>, <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: add ww_mutex_is_owned_by function v4

On Tuesday, 2018-02-20 15:49:46 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> amdgpu needs to verify if userspace sends us valid addresses and the simplest
> way of doing this is to check if the buffer object is locked with the ticket
> of the current submission.
> 
> Clean up the access to the ww_mutex internals by providing a function
> for this and extend the check to the thread owning the underlying mutex.
> 
> v2: split amdgpu changes into separate patch as suggested by Alex
> v3: change logic as suggested by Daniel
> v4: fix test in case ctx is NULL
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> ---
>  include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> index 39fda195bf78..fea4acc0bcbc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
> @@ -358,4 +358,23 @@ static inline bool ww_mutex_is_locked(struct ww_mutex *lock)
>  	return mutex_is_locked(&lock->base);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * ww_mutex_is_owned_by - is the w/w mutex locked by this task in that context
> + * @lock: the mutex to be queried
> + * @ctx: the w/w acquire context to test
> + *
> + * If @ctx is not NULL test if the mutex is owned by this context.
> + * If @ctx is NULL test if the mutex is owned by the current thread and not
> + * locked in any context.
> + */
> +static inline bool ww_mutex_is_owned_by(struct ww_mutex *lock,
> +					struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	if (ctx)
> +		return likely(READ_ONCE(lock->ctx) == ctx);
> +
> +	return likely(__mutex_owner(&lock->base) == current) &&
> +		likely(READ_ONCE(lock->ctx) == NULL;
typo:                                    )

> +}
> +
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.14.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives