linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/mm/32: Use pfn_valid to check if pointer is in RAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0d14cb2c-dd00-d258-cb15-302b2a9d684f@c-s.fr>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:45:09 +0100
From:   christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/mm/32: Use pfn_valid to check if pointer is
 in RAM



Le 20/02/2018 à 17:14, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
> The Nintendo Wii has a memory layout that places two chunks of RAM at
> non-adjacent addresses, and MMIO between them. Currently, the allocation
> of these MMIO areas is made possible by declaring the MMIO hole as
> reserved memory and allowing reserved memory to be allocated (cf.
> wii_memory_fixups).
> 
> This patch is the first step towards proper support for discontiguous
> memory on PPC32 by using pfn_valid to check if a pointer points into
> RAM, rather than open-coding the check. It should result in no
> functional difference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_32.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_32.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_32.c
> index d35d9ad3c1cd..b5c009893a44 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_32.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ __ioremap_caller(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size, unsigned long flags,
>   	 * Don't allow anybody to remap normal RAM that we're using.
>   	 * mem_init() sets high_memory so only do the check after that.
>   	 */
> -	if (slab_is_available() && (p < virt_to_phys(high_memory)) &&
> +	if (slab_is_available() && pfn_valid(__phys_to_pfn(p)) &&

I'm not sure this is equivalent:

high_memory = (void *) __va(max_low_pfn * PAGE_SIZE);
#define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET		((unsigned long)(MEMORY_START >> PAGE_SHIFT))
#define pfn_valid(pfn)		((pfn) >= ARCH_PFN_OFFSET && (pfn) < max_mapnr)
set_max_mapnr(max_pfn);

So in the current implementation it checks against max_low_pfn while 
your patch checks against max_pfn

	max_low_pfn = max_pfn = memblock_end_of_DRAM() >> PAGE_SHIFT;
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
	max_low_pfn = lowmem_end_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
#endif

Christophe

>   	    !(__allow_ioremap_reserved && memblock_is_region_reserved(p, size))) {
>   		printk("__ioremap(): phys addr 0x%llx is RAM lr %ps\n",
>   		       (unsigned long long)p, __builtin_return_address(0));
> 

---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus