[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1519161268.3737.12.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:29 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>
CC: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"leonro@...lanox.com" <leonro@...lanox.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/core: reduce IB_POLL_BATCH constant
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 21:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> /* # of WCs to poll for with a single call to ib_poll_cq */
> -#define IB_POLL_BATCH 16
> +#define IB_POLL_BATCH 8
The purpose of batch polling is to minimize contention on the cq spinlock.
Reducing the IB_POLL_BATCH constant may affect performance negatively. Has
the performance impact of this change been verified for all affected drivers
(ib_srp, ib_srpt, ib_iser, ib_isert, NVMeOF, NVMeOF target, SMB Direct, NFS
over RDMA, ...)?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists