linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC tools/lkmm 05/12] README: Fix a couple of punctuation errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1519169112-20593-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:25:05 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        parri.andrea@...il.com, will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
        nborisov@...e.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tools/lkmm 05/12] README: Fix a couple of punctuation errors

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
index 9a3bb5949191..dca7d823ad57 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ IRIW+mbonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
 	between each pairs of reads.  In other words, is smp_mb()
 	sufficient to cause two different reading processes to agree on
 	the order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
-	variable by a different process.
+	variable by a different process?
 
 IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
 	Test of independent reads from independent writes with nothing
 	between each pairs of reads.  In other words, is anything at all
 	needed to cause two different reading processes to agree on the
 	order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
-	variable by a different process.
+	variable by a different process?
 
 ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
 	As below, but with store-release replaced with WRITE_ONCE()
-- 
2.5.2