[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a33f0c2-4bef-5c9f-906e-b1d6d44f6de6@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:23:10 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, magnus.damm@...il.com,
geert@...der.be, mchehab@...nel.org, festevam@...il.com,
sakari.ailus@....fi, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
pombredanne@...b.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/11] media: i2c: ov772x: Support frame interval
handling
On 02/21/18 16:16, jacopo mondi wrote:
>>> static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops ov772x_subdev_pad_ops = {
>>> - .enum_mbus_code = ov772x_enum_mbus_code,
>>> - .get_selection = ov772x_get_selection,
>>> - .get_fmt = ov772x_get_fmt,
>>> - .set_fmt = ov772x_set_fmt,
>>> + .enum_frame_interval = ov772x_enum_frame_interval,
>>> + .enum_mbus_code = ov772x_enum_mbus_code,
>>> + .get_selection = ov772x_get_selection,
>>> + .get_fmt = ov772x_get_fmt,
>>> + .set_fmt = ov772x_set_fmt,
>>
>> Shouldn't these last four ops be added in the previous patch?
>> They don't have anything to do with the frame interval support.
>>
>
> If you look closely you'll notice I have just re-aligned them, since I
> was at there to add enum_frame_interval operation
Ah, sorry. I missed that. Never mind then :-)
Hans
>
>> Anyway, after taking care of the memsets and these four ops you can add
>> my:
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
>
> Thanks
> j
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists