linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 11/11] media: i2c: ov7670: Fully set mbus frame fmt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <287b38a5-d952-7600-2180-df08ab002b03@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:28:27 +0100
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>, magnus.damm@...il.com,
        geert@...der.be, mchehab@...nel.org, festevam@...il.com,
        sakari.ailus@....fi, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        pombredanne@...b.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/11] media: i2c: ov7670: Fully set mbus frame fmt

On 02/21/2018 04:47 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hello again,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:58:57AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Hi Jacopo,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the patch.
>>>
>>> On Monday, 19 February 2018 18:59:44 EET Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>>>> The sensor driver sets mbus format colorspace information and sizes,
>>>> but not ycbcr encoding, quantization and xfer function. When supplied
>>>> with an badly initialized mbus frame format structure, those fields
>>>> need to be set explicitly not to leave them uninitialized. This is
>>>> tested by v4l2-compliance, which supplies a mbus format description
>>>> structure and checks for all fields to be properly set.
>>>>
>>>> Without this commit, v4l2-compliance fails when testing formats with:
>>>> fail: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(335): ycbcr_enc >= 0xff
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/media/i2c/ov7670.c | 4 ++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov7670.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov7670.c
>>>> index 25b26d4..61c472e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov7670.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov7670.c
>>>> @@ -996,6 +996,10 @@ static int ov7670_try_fmt_internal(struct v4l2_subdev
>>>> *sd, fmt->height = wsize->height;
>>>>  	fmt->colorspace = ov7670_formats[index].colorspace;
>>>
>>> On a side note, if I'm not mistaken the colorspace field is set to SRGB for
>>> all entries. Shouldn't you hardcode it here and remove the field ?
>>>
>>>> +	fmt->ycbcr_enc = V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT;
>>>> +	fmt->quantization = V4L2_QUANTIZATION_DEFAULT;
>>>> +	fmt->xfer_func = V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT;
>>>
>>> How about setting the values explicitly instead of relying on defaults ? That
>>> would be V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_601, V4L2_QUANTIZATION_LIM_RANGE and
>>> V4L2_XFER_FUNC_SRGB. And could you then check a captured frame to see if the
>>> sensor outputs limited or full range ?
>>>
>>
>> This actually makes me wonder if those informations (ycbcb_enc,
>> quantization and xfer_func) shouldn't actually be part of the
>> supported format list... I blindly added those default fields in the
>> try_fmt function, but I doubt they applies to all supported formats.
>>
>> Eg. the sensor supports YUYV as well as 2 RGB encodings (RGB444 and
>> RGB 565) and 1 raw format (BGGR). I now have a question here:
>>
>> 1) ycbcr_enc transforms non-linear R'G'B' to Y'CbCr: does this
>> applies to RGB and raw formats? I don't think so, and what value is
>> the correct one for the ycbcr_enc field in this case? I assume
>> xfer_func and quantization applies to all formats instead..
>>
> 
> What if I repropose this as separate patch not part of the CEU series
> in order not to hold back v10 (which I hope will be the last CEU
> iteration)?

I would definitely be fine with that. We first need to define what
exactly should be done by drivers. See also this thread:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg23888.html

I'll work on that going forward as part of the compliance tests.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
>> Thanks
>>    j
>>
>>>>  	info->format = *fmt;
>>>>
>>>>  	return 0;
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Laurent Pinchart
>>>